Tigermed Insight

Regulatory Pathways for Clinical Trials in China – Navigating the New Dual-Track System

Jun 10, 2026

With the release of the "Guideline for Initiating Clinical Trials in China" in May 2026, the regulatory landscape for clinical trials in China has undergone a significant transformation. Introduced by State Council Order No.818, China has officially implemented a new "Dual-Track" regulatory system. This article provides a comprehensive overview of this new framework, dissecting the regulatory pathways for IND, IIT, and NBT to offer actionable strategic guidance for global biopharmaceutical companies and research institutions.


Understanding the New "Dual-Track" Regulatory System

State Council Order No.818 clearly defines two parallel regulatory tracks for clinical trials in China:

1.     Traditional NMPA Product Registration Track (IND):

Regulatory Body: Regulated by the National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) and approved by the Center for Drug Evaluation (CDE).

Sponsor: Must be a legal entity.

2.     NHC Regulated Track (IIT and NBT):

Regulatory Body: Regulated by the National Health Commission (NHC).

Sponsor: For Investigator-Initiated Trials (IIT), the sponsors are the investigators. For clinical trials involving New Biomedical Technology (NBT), the sponsor must be a Chinese legal entity.

Approval Process: Requires an academic commitment and Ethics Committee (EC) approval, followed by filing in the NHC.


Spotlight on NBT: The "Technology Translation" Fast Track

The Regulations on the Administration of Clinical Research and Clinical Translation Application of New Biomedical Technologies (State Council Order No. 818) introduces a fast pathway for NBT. This regulation was released on October 10, 2025, and took effect on May 1, 2026.

1.     Which Therapies Qualify for the NBT Fast Track?

The new pathway applies to a clearly defined set of innovative technologies, which include:

Personalized cell therapies and gene editing (e.g., viral and non-viral vector-based gene therapies).

Brain-computer interfaces (invasive and non-invasive).

Xenotransplantation and tissue engineering.

Stem cell therapy, CAR-T, and assisted reproductive technology.

Microbiological therapies (e.g., oncolytic microbial therapy, phage therapy, and microbiota transplantation).

2.     How Can Global Biopharma Benefit?

Faster Time-to-Market: Allows a quicker route to commercializing advanced therapies in China.

Lower Regulatory Burden: Offers a potentially more streamlined set of regulatory requirements.

New Deal Opportunities: Opens up novel licensing and partnership possibilities.

Viable Path for Hospital-Based Clinics: Establishes a compliant path for therapies traditionally developed and administered within a hospital setting. 


Deep Dive into Regulatory Pathways and Timelines

When pursuing the IND pathway, which supports multi-regional clinical trials and global development, sponsors only need one IND approval to cover Phase I through Phase III clinical trials for a single indication, though an End of Phase 2 (EOP2) meeting and a final New Drug Application (NDA) or Biologics License Application (BLA) are mandatory. While a regular IND review takes 60 working days, an accelerated 30-working-day review is available for nationally supported key innovative drugs, innovative drugs and traditional Chinese medicines for pediatric use or rare diseases, and globally developed drugs in Phase I/II or Phase III multi-regional clinical trials that assign a China physician as a leading or co-Principal Investigator.

Conversely, the IIT and NBT pathways follow a more streamlined initial process. After securing scientific review by an Academic Committee and ethics review by an Ethics Committee, the dossier filing in the Medical Research Registration and Filing System takes only 5 working days, entirely bypassing a formal technical review. However, the NHC maintains full-process supervision over these trials and retains the authority to conduct risk assessments and suspend studies if necessary.


Strategic Decision-Making: Choosing Between IIT/NBT and IND

Selecting the correct regulatory path is vital for maximizing capital efficiency and long-term asset value. The following comparison highlights the key operational and strategic differences:


Conclusion

China's newly refined Dual-Track system provides global innovators with unprecedented flexibility. Whether leveraging the accelerated 30-day IND route for standardized global therapies or utilizing the NBT fast track for cutting-edge, personalized treatments, understanding these parallel pathways is crucial for success.

Tigermed provides end-to-end support from discovery to clinical and is dedicated to be your trusted partner for initiating clinical research in China, helping you navigate China’s complex and opportunity-rich regulatory environment.


Download the PDF version: https://www.tigermedgrp.com/files/39b4f814fe86f66130494158f3058e56.pdf


Contact

Email: marketing@tigermedgrp.com
Website: www.tigermedgrp.com